f is hexadecimal for 15, which could have been more clever
real is inherently unsuitable for human currencies since those are usually accounted for in cents or hundredths of cents, and floating-point rounding errors are not great for financial accountability, so rational formats with a denominator of 100 or 10,000 would be more suitable.
It actually seems to make too little sense for that.
These make no sense.
“Boolean” does not rhyme with “fooling,” or even “foolin’.” Maybe “bullying.”
Integers are real numbers.
How would you make a dry, solid fuel from soup?
Array index -1 is almost always out-of-bounds on an array.
f. C++ is far more suited for OOP than Python.
Also, who counts “2, 3, 4, 5, f?”
Hentai porn
David Bowie was the force holding the universe together.
Time for Bussard to invent those collectors
Harambe was a consequence, not the cause.
no
Sounds like it’s just trying to mix up words to make normal cause and effect sound like spooky action at a distance.
Yes, that was my point.
Gold markets are too volatile.
Not everyone agrees:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html
In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are exceptions.
First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
Yes please
I wanna just plug Wikipedia into this and see if it turns an LLM into something useful for the general case.
I’ve interviewed people with Master’s degrees that couldn’t figure out how to put together a for loop.
Basic competencies need to be confirmed.
Yeah, we flap our meat at each other for an hour or so. These days it’s usually over a video call rather than in the same room, but there’s little functional difference.
My employer has its own homebrewed interview segment to cover this. It’s more subjective than a standardized test, but it’s arguably more fun and less insulting (although that doesn’t stop some entitled candidates from getting all huffy about it).
Please do not eat aluminum shavings.
Not a problem, I’m sure they couldn’t get worse.
The best answer for a basic CS exam would probably be to say to use an integer to store dollars, and an another to store cents.