fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzimagemessage-square90linkfedilinkarrow-up1359arrow-down12
arrow-up1357arrow-down1imageAt this rate, why not.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square90linkfedilink
minus-squareVenator@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoAlso would it kill all the sea life leading to a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions from all the decomposing fish corpses? Does undersea decomposition release greenhouse gases?
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoAnd doesn’t plankton already sequester CO2 on the ocean floor when it dies?
minus-squareTeamAssimilation@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoOh right. The solution of course is a bigger bomb.
Also would it kill all the sea life leading to a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions from all the decomposing fish corpses? Does undersea decomposition release greenhouse gases?
And doesn’t plankton already sequester CO2 on the ocean floor when it dies?
Oh right. The solution of course is a bigger bomb.