fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agocheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzexternal-linkmessage-square44linkfedilinkarrow-up1917arrow-down117
arrow-up1900arrow-down1external-linkcheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square44linkfedilink
minus-squareCornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareCarbonBasedNPU@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·10 months agoWhen a scientific paper has one of those titles I assume it is bullshit until proven otherwise. I can not trust a paper that does not even trust itself to stand on its own merits.
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoI agree. Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoI mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties. Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution. You can have both.
deleted by creator
When a scientific paper has one of those titles I assume it is bullshit until proven otherwise. I can not trust a paper that does not even trust itself to stand on its own merits.
I agree.
Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties.
Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution.
You can have both.