lumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoobserves your slitquokk.auimagemessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1526arrow-down119
arrow-up1507arrow-down1imageobserves your slitquokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square43linkfedilink
minus-squaresbeak@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agotop is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
minus-squareLOGIC💣@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoOh I see I was overthinking it.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoDon’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
minus-squareBjörn@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThough as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoDo you mean that they are not as noisy?
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoHuh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.
top is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
Oh I see I was overthinking it.
Don’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
Though as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
Do you mean that they are not as noisy?
More noisy.
Huh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.