fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoIrrationalmander.xyzimagemessage-square56linkfedilinkarrow-up1305arrow-down134
arrow-up1271arrow-down1imageIrrationalmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square56linkfedilink
minus-squarerbits@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoIf you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
minus-squarethemeatbridge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoBut if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
minus-squarerbits@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoRight, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying
If you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
But if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
Right, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying