I saw the immediate aftermath. Someone jumped off the 8th floor in an interior atrium after setting off the building fire alarm. I happened to look that way while evacuating and it took a moment to process what I was seeing.
I saw the immediate aftermath. Someone jumped off the 8th floor in an interior atrium after setting off the building fire alarm. I happened to look that way while evacuating and it took a moment to process what I was seeing.
I was trying to find information about this restriction. It seems it applies to cash and relates to Danish banks’ ability to implement AML controls. https://www.nationalbanken.dk/en/what-we-do/notes-and-coins/exchange-of-danish-cash-abroad
Literally mythical man month
Interest rates rose above 0% for the first time in a decade and suddenly profit became more important than growth.
Edit: actually I’m wrong and it’s more complicated than that, but in essence the era of free money came to an end. Interest rates were increasing before 2020 in very gradual increments, but then went to zero, also accompanied by a lot of money being injected into the system.
https://www.macrotrends.net/2015/fed-funds-rate-historical-chart
So the sudden change at the end of the chart is what caused the regime change driving the trend of growth-driven companies trying to generate a profit - many not having a clue how to do it because they’ve never done it before.
Probably best to avoid systems with known deniable encryption methods, and keep your dummy data there. Then hide your secrets e.g. in deleted space on a drive, in the cloud, or a well-hidden micro-sd card. All have risks, maybe it’s best of all to not keep your secrets with you, and make sure they can’t be associated with you.
As referred in other comment, the counter counter is to just keep beating to get further keys/hidden data.
There are some cases involving plausible deniability where game theory tells you should beat the person until dead even if they give up their keys, since there might be more.
deleted by creator
The only theft going on is the ongoing theft from the public domain, due to corruption of copyright law by special interests enabled by law for hire. Your analogy is irrelevant as the marginal cost of operating a park for an extra visitor is not zero.
I will gladly take a position of moral superiority, because copyright has evolved from a very limited monopoly, intended to encourage creativity while balancing public access, into a licence for corporations to seek rent.
So, call it stealing if you like, I will sleep well tonight regardless.
But stealing is not owning so QED
Bankruptcy court?
If your business model needs undercover advocates to fake grassroots legitimacy you may have a problem.
If buying is not owning, copying is not stealing. Simple as that.
Virtualize fun things for projects
You’re right and it’s a pragmatic approach to the problem. They only need broad technical effectiveness to change user behaviour.
I’d argue that it’s not strictly cost cutting but cost transferring. The total client resources most likely exceed that which would be needed on servers.
If your security relies on software in the control of the end user you have a problem.
Probably. It’s in f-droid but increasingly looking not quite unmaintained, but not developed actively enough.
I had to create one this year after discovering that connectbot (ssh client on Android) didn’t support agent forwarding otherwise.
I don’t think we will find out.