WIth or without tax?

For Windows 11, it would be an ad for Hitler instead of just a picture.

Only one century has passed since then, so we’re still good. It’s pollutin’ time!

In other words - like 99% of the laws: good publicity intentions meets reality.

If he thinks something doesn’t matter just because the people involved are dead, maybe history is not the right academic field for him.

Yup that’s what I mean.

Seems like a reasonable limitation then (not that the entire business model of scientific journals is reasonable in the 21st century is reasonable - just this specific limitation). The journal’s theme is proprietary, but the paper’s authors still have the LaTeX source so they can just slap a free preamble on it and publish it with that.

So basically the article you are allowed to release can have its typesetting - it just can’t have the journal’s preamble/theme?

or even sometimes the peer-reviewed, but NOT typeset article

What does that mean? The LaTeX source?

You are assuming here that I know what I want. What if there is no obviously correct answer, and even in the Everett branch that generates the optimal content for the file I’ll still think it can be improved and tell it to destroy the universe?

What if there is no correct answer?

I just use this:

#!/bin/bash

keep_generating=1
while [[ $keep_generating == 1 ]]; do
    dd if=/dev/random of=$1 bs=1 count=$2 status=none
    echo Contents of $1 are:
    cat $1
    echo
    read -p "Try generating again? " -s -n1 answer
    while true; do
        case $answer in
            [Yy] )
                echo
                break
                ;;
            [Nn] )
                keep_generating=0
                break
                ;;
            *)
        esac
        read -s -n1 answer
    done
done

We really should stop killing dragonflies for usage in the stained glass industry.

This is Rust. You don’t need a safe word - safe is the default. You need an unsafe word instead.

What do you mean by “improving”? This alarming warning appears because Firefox requires permissions. Let us look at the permissions listed there:

1. “User device access”. From the docs, I’d say the browser needs it for rendering?
2. “Download folder read/write access”. This one is obvious - the files you download with your browser go there.
3. “Can access some specific files”. This one, I’ll admit, is a bit cryptic - what files does it need to access? But this one is on Flatpak for making the permission so general.

App permissions should not be about “this app cannot be trusted because it asks for scary scary permissions”. They should be about “take a look at the list of permissions the app requests and determine whether or not it make sense for such an app to need such permissions”.

Nearly every app should have a warning

No. If you put a warning on every app (except for the most trivial ones that don’t actually do anything useful) then the warnings mean nothing. The become something more than ass-covering legal(ish) BS.

\cdot master race. \times users should just use Microsoft Word (unless it’s for a Cartesian product or for cross product, of course)

I’ll start using it after I migrate to Wayland.

Do you have a cropped tattoo? Can we see it?

They’re anteaters.

Take me home