Straight. Or non-gay, cis, heterosexual? It’s only clinical if you treat it that way…

This is great! It should totally be a Pokemon.

Bigots referring to “Normal” women implies the existence of Fire/Psychic/Dark/Null, etc type women.

Empathy and caring how others want to be referred to is HR?? Lol, wild…

I can’t speak for anyone else, but you seem to be missing the biggest issue with this map: saying “you guys” excludes anyone but those identifying as males. You may not mean it that way, but I’ve had women be offended when I used that in the past, and I wouldn’t like being referred to as a “gal” in a group of women. It’s just not accurate.

Personally, for a gender-neutral way of addressing a group, I like “you folks”.

In that case, it’s probably any gasket that’s susceptible to this, coffee is really strong-smelling. My Zojirushi thermos is only used for coffee, for this reason…

Other people are saying “cast iron” or other broad brands/categories, but this is the only one that doesn’t fall under OP’s request?? Nonsense.

Okay, I’m sold.

Wait, you’re saying not to use coffee in a Stanley thermos?? Even if I don’t have milk in it too? What’s it for then, only soup?

deleted by creator

Which Star Trek character has the loudest penis?

I thought it was “Clear Eggs”. Always cleared my eggs… 🤷‍♂️

Look, I’m trying to lose the COVID weight, okay? Insults are unnecessary!

Saddam Hussein?

Now imagine you’re a hungry sea turtle.

I already do that every day. What’s next?

Like Freedom. I love my niece and nephew and enjoy spending time with them. But if I had to feed, clothe, clean up after, provide for, and entertain them 24 hours a day (not even considering when they were babies!)… I literally cannot imagine it.

Have you seen how they handle transported things!?

Woah, this is heavy!

Also, we could be way off on the age because we just don’t know. Sure, we can collect data and extrapolate for billions of years and assume that all elements have always decayed at the same rate, but short of living through it and accurately measuring it with modern instruments, molecules-to-man “macro” evolution can’t actually be proven.

This is why, using the Scientific Method, it is still a theory. A theory accepted by most scientists, but still. There’s a certain arrogance in declaring solved something we can’t actually know for 100% certainty.