Somehow there’s never time to do it right, but there’s always time to do it again
Just a guy doing stuff.
Somehow there’s never time to do it right, but there’s always time to do it again
I’m sorry, my goal wasn’t to be a bother. My initial comment was intended to be friendly and funny - I’m not trying to patronize or be antagonistic. I learned a couple of years ago that I have autism, so I should have learned my lesson by now and stopped trying to be funny; It never pans out the way I mean for it to.
Hope I wasn’t too much of a drag on your day, and I hope it gets better for you.
With that said, a genuine question with no jokes: Can you help me understand how 2016 counts as recent, given the context? It was almost a decade ago, and I’m having trouble comprehending how it counts at all as recent since in tech “recent” usually means “in the last 2-3 years” unless you’re comparing to something from a much longer time ago like the 90s.
It was a lighthearted jab at calling 8 years ago recent; Not a political statement about Apple or operating systems.
8 years is a ton of time in tech, CPUs from 2016 are ancient. Single-core CPU performance has doubled in Intel’s laptop chips since then, and modern laptop CPUs from Intel are often 12-core, versus the top end 2016 MacBook Pro having 4 cores.
Not trying to start any fights, was just poking fun at the choice to call 2016 recent
I can read, and a 2016 MacBook pro is not even a bit recent; It’s from 8 years ago :-)
Just a bit of light-hearted leg pulling, nothing to get worked up over
I hate to break it to you friendo, but 8 year old hardware isn’t recent. It may still be usable, but that doesn’t make it recent. It’s ok though grandpa, let’s get you back to bed
The dual GPU problem has actually for the most part also been solved; Optimus rarely poses a problem these days
I’ve always heard it as “Where you mean to say one thing but fuck your mother”
What would an operating system need yank registers for? Maybe if you get a good text editor to go with it, like Evil Mode 😉
It has one bearing: it puts them in the same location together
That’s the question mark next to man
For those I just commit with the message “ngl there’s a lot of changes in here”
Always fail soft in underlying code and hard in user space IMHO
I do; you’re only dismissing it because it’s formatted differently from the exact workflow you’re describing, but it’s certainly just as powerful if not more so
You can get pretty close to the same experience with https://github.com/mfussenegger/nvim-dap, any others?
I went helix -> vim -> emacs -> kakoune -> neovim, super interesting to see how people’s experiences differ
Most of the productivity comes from the motions; Being able to jump around the text incredibly fast, combining motions with actions and repeats, it’s unparalleled in the sheer speed. I can delete an entire function with the same basic pattern Id use to delete a word.
daf
-> Delete the current function my cursor is on
daw
-> Delete the current word
d3af
-> Delete the next three functions
Stuff like that, but with everything
Name a downside, I’ll tell you how you’re probably wrong
I blame my autism
I can’t tell if you’re trolling; Page up and page down are different from “I need to jump 10 lines down” with 10j
. Or 11 lines with 11j
. Or “Delete the line I’m on and the six below it” with d6j
.
I can imagine that getting confused with Guix (pronounced geeks)