• 4 Posts
  • 67 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 1st, 2023

help-circle
  • ISOmorph@feddit.detoPrivacy@lemmy.ml[QUESTION] Privacy and the digital euro
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    There are a lot of issues with your post imo.

    First, cash is going away, soon. Sweden has done it years ago. Europe is now playing catch up.

    Second, a universal digital currency will remove all system heterogeneity. Yes money is already digitalised, but across several proprietary environments. I can and have set up several accounts across several banks so my spending cannot be fully tracked by a single corporate entity. This will be moot once everyone has to use the same harmonized system.

    Third, one of the sponsors of the universal European currency has been caught talking about time limited digital currency. As in, spend your money or it just disintegrates after a set amount of time. Which really destroyed a lot of trust in the endeavour



  • Money transfer platforms are even worse than chat apps in terms of how acceptance dictates usefulness. You might convince a couple of friends to use xmpp instead of whatsapp. But its near impossible to get major outlets to integrate new payment methods. Especially if that platform advocates privacy and therefore doesn’t offer a return on invest based on user data. I don’t think we’re gonna see true alternatives without government regulation, and even then…





  • ISOmorph@feddit.detoPrivacy@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Privacy matters most in the individual case, with people who know you.

    That statement is subjective at best. My friends and coworkers knowing where I live certainly isn’t my concern. In today’s day and age privacy enthusiasts are definitely more scared of corpos and governments.

    isn’t worth it yet.

    You’re thinking too small. Just in the context of the e2ee ban planned in europe, think what you could do. The new law is set to scan all your messages before/after sending for specific keywords. Imagine you get automatically flagged and now an AI is scanning all your pictures for locations and contacts and what not. Just the thought that might be technically possible is scary as hell.








  • ISOmorph@feddit.detoPrivacy@lemmy.mlany xmpp user ?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    3 reasons for me:

    • XMPP implementations have been around so much longer than signal, to me signal would be “just another messaging app”

    • XMPP doesn’t require my phone number. Signal might give you the option to use usernames with your contacts, but still requires a valid number for registration last I checked.

    • I can self host an XMPP server instead of trusting/depending on someone else.






  • It’s a false dichotomy to argue that a service can’t have a free privacy respecting offering.

    I don’t believe anyone is arguing that it’s technically impossible. But reality is pretty clear that it’s implausible. Targeted ads reel in too much money.

    I think the real fallacy is getting used to services being free at all. You need to pay a monthly fee for basically every utility, but as soon as it’s in the digital world people expect that to change. What makes a search engine or mail provider so much different than your ISP or cable provider? You want competent services that respect your privacy? Pay for alternatives like Kagi and Proton.