I don’t know how you can live like that.
We don’t, we develop mental health issues and our bodies get crippled in the process too.
I don’t know how you can live like that.
We don’t, we develop mental health issues and our bodies get crippled in the process too.
Yeah but why did they need to get political about it?/s
From what I understand its a Nickel alloy that has good magnetic properties which can replace rare earth alloys for magnets that renewable technology is heavily reliant on. At face value yes this would be pretty big, but in terms of actual real world practicality on replacing rare earth magnets I really couldn’t tell you. Most science articles tend to oversell scientific breakthroughs in my experience, science is slow and incremental, if it’s a real breakthrough the technology tends to catch fire fairly quickly before any articles are written on it
The title on this article is one of my favorite gems:
https://www.yahoo.com/tech/scientific-breakthrough-mysterious-cosmic-metal-190000695.html
That’s the easy part, crossing the sea from Tierra del Fuego to Antártica is where it gets hairy
Legit question, any way to get into the antarctic research statiom without having a PhD or being a grad student
Bloodbath? Not sure, depends on how close the election is, because if it’s close then Trumps cronies who are in posts of election officials will try to manipulate the votes and it could be enough to call into question Harris’ win in the eyes of some, leading to another Jan 6 type situation, but probably more widespread this time around.
If Harris wins by a landslide I think there will be some grumbling and bitching but for the most part people will accept it.
If the election is REALLY close (like Al Gore v Bush) and Harris wins I think things could get pretty dirty in certain states.
Me, oblivious: this would be a good graphic to insert Saddam Hussein
Not me drinking out of a beaker I keep on my analytical bench 😚🥰😋💀
I have a 22L round bottom reactor in my hood thats full of beans
Fuuuuu
There reason there is something instead of nothing is survivorship bias. Since nothing is nothing, including no time, there will ALWAYS be something because nothing can’t exist outside of something.
The thing is these are established methods with clear instructions but I can’t get the right numbers for whatever reason it’s really making me question if I’m even a chemist. Blowing glass, now that sounds pretty fucking hard actually
Me at my job right now. Apparently titrations and loss on ignition is some of the hardest shit to ever do in science
I’m about to start drinking my titrant
Depends on the indicator.
That’s why you stick to National Forests. Just make sure not to get lost and eaten by a bear.