• 0 Posts
  • 153 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 18th, 2023

help-circle















  • MotoAsh@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzBryony Page
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Easy to be superior when he’s denying the existance of basic observations… If you agree with him, you should rethink how science works. Just because we do not yet know what Dark Matter is does not mean we cannot know that something is creating an observable effect.

    If you deny that, you deny how SCIENCE LITERALLY WORKS.



  • MotoAsh@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzBryony Page
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    You stated no fact, dummy. Dark matter has been proven to be an existing phenominon, not something we know what it’s made of, or we’d call itthat instead. It’s called “dark matter” BECAUSE it doesn’t interact with light. We can observe it indirectly, with actual, literal proof.

    There are galaxies whos spin works fine with newtonian physics and those who do not. That is the most basic explanation of why we know it exists: because there are differences observed around the universe that can be explained if there is a form of matter that we cannot directly see.

    I shame your pitiful ignorance that you repeatedly show off so proudly. Shame on you for daring to spread ignorance.


  • MotoAsh@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzBryony Page
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Producing dark matter”… and you think that’s a valid question!? We don’t even know what causes dark matter, and your ignorant ass wants proof on what we cannot yet explicitly define?

    Shame on you, and shame on anyone who upvotes such a blatantly ignorant expression of doubt.


  • MotoAsh@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzBryony Page
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    The dissertation wouldn’t have to prove anything unquestionably. It would just have to demonstrate a sound understanding of good principles that are being worked from.

    Any conclusions could be completely wrong, and it could still be a great dissertation.

    Think of how long it took paleontologists to prove dinosaurs had feathers. Every other paleontologist before then was not a blithering idiot.