so after trying to translate, I went down a rabbit hole but here you go; the lady herself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bukNN6cHu9A&t=31s
so after trying to translate, I went down a rabbit hole but here you go; the lady herself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bukNN6cHu9A&t=31s
ooooohh, thanks for clearing that up!
take my upvote, damnit
She’s just not that into you man.
“have you tried turning it off and back on again?”
i.e. i’ve seen it correct itself by unsubscribing and subscribing again
gotta watch for those social justice warrior accounts
gotcha ok i think i’m getting it. just to make sure i’m not missing anything, you’re saying that in this case it didn’t matter as in the end they could use any TLD and achieve the same effect.
but in general, threat actors hope to confuse people into thinking this “.zip” TLDs are only referencing local files instead of web addresses. right?
i think i understand that part but why is this specific event “another reason to block this TLD”? can’t they just use any TLD for this and achieve the same thing? is there another inherit security issue with .zip that doesn’t exist with other domains?
i concur. i too wanna know.
sorry i’m missing it. why this specific TLD? can’t they just use any TLD for this and achieve the same thing? is there something special with .mov?
sorry i’m missing it. why this specific TLD? can’t they just use any TLD for this and achieve the same thing? why is this a reason to block it?
I would bet he was angry that this guy didn’t work off the clock during a ‘surge’ to support his chronically understaffed ‘team’.