TheDankHold

Actually I bring this up because when talking about famines people love to downplay the strife caused by capitalists maximizing profit and socializing loses.

Ironically your last paragraph is a pretty accurate paraphrasing of the usual dialogue around capitalisms faults.

Modern Russian is a capitalist oligarchy. Your entire position is based on ignorance of how the world functions.

The question becomes then, are those stable democracies threatened? I would argue no, that you’re using irrelevant examples to prove your position.

American capitalism was threatened to an extent by Bernie’s campaign and a contemporary cnn headline compared his “rise” to that of Hitler. So you tell me. Do they get defensive when actual leftist principles are on the line. Looks to me that it is the case.

I’m glad you answered in their stead. Obviously you’re the kind of person to steel man arguments to truly show their weaknesses and strengths. You’d never regurgitate boiler plate talking points from people opposed to the ideology.

Never look up how many famines have been overseen by capitalist countries btw. It’d make your comparison lack any meaningful difference. India was run by the east India trading company when they had the bengal famine after all. And don’t forget how the Irish “potato” famine happened. (The British made it a crime to keep any non potato crop for themselves).

Look up some stats. More people that lived during the stable years miss it compared to the economic unrest they face now.

I would say you’re arguing from ignorance then. The civil war in America happened because slavers didn’t like the outcome of an election.

It’s about threatening mob violence if “you try it in a small town”. Various actions are included such as actual crimes or disrespecting a police officer. It also throws in a line about how gubmint wants all your guns and they’ll totally act on that any day now so buy as many guns and as much ammo as you can.

The silent majority didn’t really participate. What were seeing is the results of the loud minority.

Just so you know, India is the largest contributor of undernourished people in the world so that fact might complicate the position you’re advocating.

Source: https://www.feedingindia.org/blog/understanding-the-malnutrition-crisis-in-india/#:~:text=As%20per%20the%20Government%20of,and%203%20percent%20are%20overweight.

When it comes to doing this right, this is not it.

Sounds like they should join the strike then. Not attending the negotiations means your interests are unrepresented at the table.

Again, are you advocating that these other workers join the fight or that everyone should just step back and let themselves get exploited?

Corporate movies suck but they’re not going anywhere. They’ll just get worse in quality.

Sounds like they should join the strike then. Unless your solution is for everyone to get screwed equally.

How is 3 useless? If you want to do a profession or skillful activity you just need to warm up a bit and you’ll excel. You can write amazing stories, be a 5 star chef, learn any language and make option 1 redundant, you can do anything a single person can accomplish.

I’d say 3&4 are the prime combo. Succeed at whatever you want to do and be in perfect health the whole time

Also if you have 3

If you pick 3 then that means you should be able to accomplish 1 with your immense talent