My answer is usually “I don’t care how well it runs on your windows machine. Our deployments are on Linux”.
I’m a old developer that has done a lot of admin over the years out of necessity.
My answer is usually “I don’t care how well it runs on your windows machine. Our deployments are on Linux”.
I’m a old developer that has done a lot of admin over the years out of necessity.
A user
IT is an administrative function and is really part of operations.
Software development is generally a creative position and is a profit center. If you work somewhere where you develop internal apps, you may have a different perspective.
It goes both ways. At my old job, they took away local admin. But for some reason they configured visual studio to run as admin. So, I just wrote a little program that opens the shell. Whenever I needed admin, I just ran that program from Visual Studio.
At least New Orleans and Florida are spared.
I’ve had to explain so many times how text pages work with copy on write semantics.
I don’t know about watching it without having seen all the prior episodes but “The Nightman Cometh” is funniest half hour comedy ever produced.
Mine is more of a mixture of static and a hum. Maybe what tingly would sound like.
Was your idea time travel?
I always add an ‘a’ to the end and wish I could buy pavlova in the USA.
At least they haven’t taken away our shoes. And is there a limit to the number of 3 Oz bottles you can carry?
We’re talking about this: “Who gets to have the time-zone that’s noon at noon?”
That established the context that we are talking about time zones.
Actually you only mentioned timezone “who gets to have the time zone where noon is directly overhead” and then went into a rant about England vs France. You never once mentioned the meridian.
the correct time zone is UTC not Greenwich Mean Time.
By your logic it would be a positive for your code to have errors/warnings. And on the latter, that would appropriate if there was a test that determined if you are free from all known diseases (or at least those that it can detect).
That’s why I said false negative. The medical test is testing for the presence of a disease. So if they find the disease is considered a positive test (it found what it was looking for). For static analysis on code, its the opposite. Its testing if your code is free of issues that it can detect. If it finds no issues, then the test was positive. If does find issues, the test failed and each issue is a negative that contributed to the test failing.
Warnings and errors are negatives not positive. So if it generates a warning that is OK, it’s a false negative.
Then things will have to wait until the code is of sufficient quality to be accepted.
My experience is exactly the opposite. I don’t work for a FAANG but I’ve been around the block a bit. Its always the junior devs that try and add new warnings etc to the code base. I always require warnings to be cleaned up even if that means disabling specific instances (but not the whole rule) because the rule is flagging a false negative.
I started getting messages every week from a carbon black scan blocking access to some npm’s package.json.
IT just white listed files named package.json.