I somewhat doubt that a company counts illegal viewers and charges more for ads because of them. So the actual broadcaster probably gets nothing.
I somewhat doubt that a company counts illegal viewers and charges more for ads because of them. So the actual broadcaster probably gets nothing.
You didn’t answer the question. Your behavior is toxic.
Wow, that’s big. Thank you for the clarification.
I’m not familiar with the service, can someone explain? Like, are all pipelines on Azure affected? Or is it some internal stuff where a company relying on paid tech forgot to pay for it?
I heard that scientists found small concentrations of Saddam Hussein even in human balls.
I see two issues:
I’d take poisonous/venomous over German grammar.
I’m glad we aren’t friends.
How’s this programmer humor?
Alright, this is my first contribution to an open-source project, albeit indirect. I’ll drink to that!
Somebody should tell Albert and the others, they can let this method go.
“p” should be lowercase, the metalbags aren’t that good yet.
Our brains don’t think in terms of statistics, we are very bad at numbers. That’s a scientific fact, see Daniel Kahneman’s “Thinking, Fast and Slow”. So to say that if 20% of the world prison population is located in the US then it’s normal to think about the US when you hear “solidarity confinement” is plain wrong. There’s no media bias like with school shootings either, you don’t read about US prisons in European media every week. Even the mainstream US media don’t talk about US prisons much. Somehow you fail to see that in the discussion about Danish and Swedish prisons one should probably consider Danish and Swedish prisons.
This is so satisfying to read lol. The USA-centrism is so annoying, especially prior their elections.
You’re more cautious with a meme than that lady with a grenade.
That sounds strange. I cannot comment on your particular case without seeing the test artifacts.
Generally speaking, there is nothing wrong with tests that ensure bad input doesn’t break the system, as this can easily lead to incorrect system states, damage to the environment, loss of data, money, reputation, and even lives - although most systems are not critical enough to threaten lives.
You wouldn’t need QAs if you only needed to validate that the product meets the requirements. In a typical company, many people are involved in that process. This includes the developer who wrote the code, the developer who reviewed it, and the people who conduct acceptance testing, among others. If your developers produce code that doesn’t meet the requirements, you’re in trouble.
I’m not saying that QA shouldn’t validate whether the system meets the requirements, but you don’t want them to do just that.
A QA engineer walks into a bar and asks where the bathroom is. The bar bursts into flames. The product owner says that the bar can be shipped anyway.
Great, it’s reliable and enforces design patterns!
I still don’t understand. I assume there is a plugin that enables github annotations in the code. But why would anyone need that?
Users will test, don’t waste your energy.