In my (personal) experience, mathematicians have absolutely no difficulty to let their colleagues know when they don’t understand a concept. It seems quite normal to reach your max level of abstraction in the field.

In physics, it can be seen as a weakness sometimes. And some people will pretend they always understand everything.

Not always true of course.

What a convoluted way to tell us that you sharted your pants.

Solid state + heat -> liquid state

I don’t see what’s so difficult about this

Since porno sites are limited to 18+ people, I suggest you could authenticate yourself by providing the link to a very specific type of videos

Top translation and you’re super nice to have taken the time to write the original text.

However I don’t think the translation was necessary: everybody on lemmy obviously speaks flüssig German.

That world, that wonderful utopic world… we could weaponize it!

Hahaha this is cartoonishly evil, surely it can’t be true!

Next you’ll tell me Ellison invests in creepy life extension projects and gives an insane amount of money to post-fascist politicians!

Because apparently the real menace in wildlife photography is using stuffed animals

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43912583

‘Rockium’ ? ‘Airium’? How ridiculous!!!

Look at western periodic table: lithium, hydrogen, helium…

Mmmh OK then

Give this person a grant and let them sciencify please

QA passed boss. All KPIs are green lights. The customer will be thrilled boss.

(Manager hasn’t been here long enough to recognize the sarcasm through the calm voice and dead eyes of the QA lead)

OK, I get your point - but I think then that it should be clearer if we’re talking about a historical figure or a legend. In this particular case, it’s a bit fuzzy unfortunately. Ancient historians and all that.

Take solace (not really) in knowing that a woman didn’t do X first, but only because of rampant misogyny (half of the time I suppose)

I don’t agree here. Truth is important. The fact that women haven’t been visible in science is important. We need to explain why they weren’t visible. Creating historical figures is comforting but if their existence is not reliably documented, we should keep explaining why such figures couldn’t emerge, and why their absence is significant.

Yes to shitposts, no to fabrications (this lady looks like one - but I suppose it was in good faith)

That’s where the top boffins of the time invented spaghetti with tomato sauce, too!

Ah! I knew it was not a novel approach. Thanks Pr. Farnsworth, you crazy sciency trailblazer.

And additional question: even if it was technically feasible, was it really ethical to surgically implant Hitler’s cloned brained into the body of a silverback gorilla and make it fight against Tigerstalin?

Because the caterpillar it mimicks is already mimicking a moth, that is mimicking a lichen. It’s right there in the name!

So about 6% sure.

It’s a non-mutual friendship, though.

Please don’t make me tap the Gang of Four’s Design Patterns book