![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
Well. Now seems to be a good time to be ashamed to be Belgian.
Shameful politicians :(
Well. Now seems to be a good time to be ashamed to be Belgian.
Shameful politicians :(
Windows: does something privacy invading bad
Google: why didn’t I think of that? Hold my beer
And fucking fine them to infinity for it. Why would they not do something like this again if all they have to do is say “my bad bro”.
I mean my Asus router models aren’t supported by merlin. Only 1 of them functions as an actual router.
But that’s the point. You, the 15 year old, never click or see the box. Your data is harvested because somebody somewhere else agreed to it.
It’s like giving any website the right to farm your data because somebody else on the same shared IP clicked accept all.
I’m also totally okay not having to send any identity data over the net. I fully agree there. It’s just their standpoint of “let an admin click it and we can farm everybody’s data behind that device” seems like a very unstable legal standpoint.
Then again. I’m not a lawyer and the law doesn’t work based on how lawful i feel something is or should be.
I’d rather update it as well. But the routers are behind my ISP router and aren’t externally accessible. The attack surface is smaller in that regard. I’m not happy with the thought of an unpatched router. Maybe I can hold out long enough for merlin to support my routers.
I dont think the latest few updates I did mentioned any security updates. Only bugfixes.
I’ll tackle the problem when it presents itself I guess.
Routers aren’t supported by merlin unfortunately :(
Is the train of thought that if the adult approves they can harvest data from minors regardless? It harvests data from anybody using the internet, not just person handling the settings. It doesn’t seem legal that the data harvest agreement binds all users in a household rather than the one managing the settings?
Is that legal in Europe? is it legal to suddenly semi brick a device if you dont allow them to data harvest? Is it really considered giving consent freely when the device you paid $$ for suddenly no longer does 90% because you disagree with sudden data harvest practices?
I can understand a feature not working because you disagree on sharing something. E.g: can’t tell you which pizza place is near you if you dont share your location.
But this? I hope it’s illegal and they get sued into oblivion for this. This is super invasive.
I guess I’m not updating my routers anymore then. Sucks though. It seemed to be the only Asus product that wasn’t garbage.
That would’ve helped to add in the original message. I dont think I’ve ever heard of “ubi” servers.
You can try installing the deb file I guess? If you google it I’m sure you can find it somewhere.
Lets get one thing straight.
This is rarely ever the developer and more a business stakeholder forcing you to push the Friday deploy button.
I’ve had somebody in the business escalating to my team lead, head of development and CIO because i flat out refused to deploy something on Friday at 16h.
So no. This is not the developer making a hard choice. There should be somebody coercing or forcing him to push the deploy button.
To gain the most security value from ZTDNS, system admins will need to enumerate the expected domains and/or IP ranges they expect their clients to connect to,” Jake Williams wrote. “Failure to do so will result in self-inflicted denial of service.”
Glad I’m on Linux/macos at home/work. Wtf is happening.
My main issue is that if I add the bitwarden TOTP secret string manually multiple times its generating different codes between the entries. Which seems like something that shouldn’t happen.
It is a different format to the other ones I’ve got though.
Fuck Microsoft authenticator though. Had to restore it to a new phones once and if you don’t do it on initial startup you can’t restore it at all. Good thing I had a secondary app that still had them. Absolute garbage.
Wait - so far its only the Microsoft MFA code that does it.
Weird. If I copy the TOTP code from bitwarden into their 2fa app I get different codes. Not even after a rotation ( one isn’t ahead of the other ). That doesn’t seem right :/
You can have bitwarden auto generate simplelogin emails as well when generating usernames. You just need to fetch an API key from simplelogin :)
Legitimate interest is just bullshit.
Can I have your:
I too am legitimately interested in this data.
Maybe your filter is set to last 3h or something?
We do this to find criminals, drugsdealers, paedophiles and terrorists. MEPS are never part of any of those groups.
Source: trust me bro >.>
Rules for thee and not for me.