See, you get it

I would assume the person is serious when posting here.

This sounds like a “you” problem

You’re no fun

Oh I wish it was. Eg. here in Finland sharing movies etc. among friends or downloading them off the internet used to be legal as long as you weren’t doing it for profit or distributing stuff to a huge audience, but that changed in 2006 because the new EU Copyright Directive required it, and that directive was hugely influenced by the likes of WIPO.

Governments rarely realize anything related to IP that the copyright mafia doesn’t spoon-feed them, unfortunately.

That’s known as a ligature and they’re pretty common in many programming-oriented fonts, which usually have stylistic sets with different ligatures for different programming languages that you can optionally enable in your editor’s configuration. For example, here’s the stylistic sets the Monaspace font offers:

Personally I’m not too fond of ligatures so I never enable any, but many folks do like them.

Edit: and just as a side note, ligatures are super common in many fonts, you just might not notice them. Here’s some classic examples from the DejaVu Serif font, with and without a ligature:

"A".reverse() == "∀"

Where is your god now?!

Use a dynamically typed language and you won’t have to: just override the default reverse() method on strings like a Real Programmer!

Unintended consequences you say? Nonsense! What could possibly go wrong?

This is absolutely true, but it still seems to me that we’re throwing the baby out with the bath water when we just stick to extremely terse symbols for everything regardless of context.

Reading articles would be so much easier if they used even slightly longer names – thankfully more and more computer science articles do tend to use more human readable naming nowadays, at least.

Sure, longer names make manipulation harder a bit more annoying if you’re doing it by hand, but if you do need to manipulate something you can then abbreviate the terms (and I’m 60% sure I’ve seen some papers that had both a longer form and a shorter form for terms, so one for explaining shit and one for the fiddly formal stuff)

Of course using terse terms is totally fine when it’s clear from the context what eg. ∆x means.

Honestly I can’t remember if they outright genocided other peoples in the area, but once the Yahwists went from monolatry (worship of one god without believing that others’ gods are false) to monotheism, iirc it did cause more conflicts between ancient Israel and Judah and their neighbors. Been a while since I last actually read about this stuff

Guess that could predispose a planet to being flat

I’m pretty sure I’m not a cephalopod. Not 100% sure though, you never know with me

Had to look it up myself, but the Ammonites were a Semitic-speaking people that the Israelites hated because they didn’t worship their god

Whoa, lemmy-ui’s markdown engine supports footnotes?!^[1]

That comment renders as

And the source is:

a ^[MG]oth

the circle Sun

The funniest part about many flat Earthers is that they do believe that other planets etc are spherical (probably because it’s obvious when you look at them through a telescope), somehow it’s just the Earth that’s flat

That’s a “good amount of thigh”?

Good thing her ankles aren’t showing in the picture too, that’d be scandalous

That’s absolutely understandable, it but it’s not where I’m coming from – which of course you wouldn’t be able to know just based on what I wrote. I’m more of an emotional softie than not, and a feminine enby in addition to being a huge nerd, and while I really do love movies that give me feels, the Nolan ham just didn’t work for me in Interstellar.

Ah yeah I get what you mean, that’s a good take on it.

Despite what some people seem to have assumed, I do think Interstellar is definitely one of the best hard scifi movies to come out in recent memory, and I really do like many parts of it. I’ll have to watch it again some day with this reframing in mind