We used to use Redmine and it was a fantastic piece of software.
We used to use Redmine and it was a fantastic piece of software.
I’m not sure that’s the fault of XML though.
It’s more the fault of the implementation and documentation.
We have a WCF service with an odd configuration and nobody has been able to integrate with it that didn’t use Microsoft tools. It’s definitely not XML’s fault.
(That service has been replaced with a REST API now)
It seems that they intend Microsoft Loop to be the collaborative notes app now.
It’s replaced OneNote as the meeting notes app and it has more flexible access control.
Currently they also only have one version as it’s a progressive web app (that might change with time though).
I guess that that’s all that matters.
Did it take time to get used to or did it work straight away?
Is it saying that the PHP developers are kids and the C++ developer is acting as their parent?
I’m not sure.
If you want to fork the repo then you make a commit to the original repo giving yourself rights then you make the fork and you’re golden.
I don’t understand why people think that it’s acceptable.
As developers, we’ve had it drummed into us from day one that variable names are important and shouldn’t be one or two letters.
Yet developers deliberately alias an easy to read table name such as “customer” into “c” because that’s the first letter of the table. I’m sure that it’s more work to do that with auto completion meaning that you don’t even need to type out “customer”.
I like the scope creep there:
Won’t autocomplete fail if you do “cd d” and then try the autocomplete?
Or is that what you mean by “decent” auto-completion?
If the ads come to Prime, then I might cancel that. It’s already our least watched service and it’s been getting a free pass because of the next day delivery.
I don’t want to watch ads, I don’t want to pay an extra £30 per year to not see ads and I don’t need next day delivery often enough to keep it for that.
Downvoting is a way to say you disagree with someone without getting into an argument.
Is that what it’s supposed to mean though? I understood it to mean that the comment either didn’t contribute to the discussion or it was actually detrimental to it.
I regularly used to upvote people that I replied to even if disagreed with them.
Obviously, if they’re being dicks then that’s a downvote.
Maybe it’s not changed then because I was using it in the early 2000s. 😀