You could’ve just said “yes, I think that’s where the ethical line is”, instead of linking logical fallacies wikipedia like a fourteen year old atheist.
We haven’t moved anywhere. We were at “working for companies profiting from genocide is wrong” and we’ve stayed right there.
Why would that matter? You think it’s alright to work for a company supplying the Palestinian genocide as long as you’re not working on that specific product line? British aerospace is pretty directly involved there so I’d set my standards a little higher personally.
If you’re working for a western arms manufacturer you can be pretty certain your products will end up in Israel too.
It’s good if your examiners have a few easy things to pick up, makes them feel useful and stops them from finding nonsense just to have something to criticise ;)
In most places the defense is kind of just a formality. It’s an important part of the ritual and the process, it’s important to present your work, but nobody should be submitting unless they’re definitely going to pass the defense, or else their supervisor has really failed them
🎶tutira mai nga iwi🎶
Yes, the Planck length
deleted by creator
Yeah, exactly, when you want to do a full upgrade it’s technically best practice to check if there’s anything which requires intervention. But I never bother honestly, and the one time there was an issue it was resolved by just uninstalling one package for another.
It does still happen occasionally that updates need some intervention, it is still policy that you should check the blog in case, but it’s only happened once in the last two years for me.
If the train killed only left handed people, you should still be left with infinite train proof right handed people.
Well, infinite left-hand-killing-train proof people, we don’t know about other trains.
Great explanation, I’d just like to add to this bit because I think it’s fun and important
And you would continue to kill infinite people every time you reached a new whole number.
Or any new number at all. Between 0 and 0.0…01 there are already infinite people. And between 0.001 and 0.002.
with the extra requirement that the probability applies to the whole set I think it checks out, intuitively anyway the expected ~0.0…01 * ∞ is still ∞, but idrk, my maths sucks
I count three 'o’s on the bottom, from “common”, “problem”, and “poems”. Seems correct to me?
Edit:
Four 'u’s from “deciduous”, “autumn”, and “until”; three 't’s from “the”, “the”, and “themselves”; two 'r’s from “stirrings” and “arrives”; three 'n’s from “when”, “begin”, and “gently”…
Not happy, just resigned to reality
He’s just never tried to say something which wasn’t allowed
It’s this photo (sfw), it’s as old as the hills. Lots of people used to have it as a profile pic because of exactly that reaction when it’s a thumbnail. I hunted for a while but couldn’t find the original source, maybe someone else knows or has better search-fu than me.
I didn’t see anything to see that these aberrations indicated anything about a type of phone? They’re unique for each lens…
Most of the modifications to aosp in graphene are security improvements, so it’s at least somewhat better than any other android
Yes, that’s me. Maybe the bit you’re missing is that if you work at a company, the company’s products are your products.
No, that’s not what I mean, and I’d appreciate you not putting words in my mouth. There is a material difference between providing Israel with military equipment and with some random consumer product that is just distributed everywhere. Sure, I’d argue it’s still wrong to do the latter, but it’s still a huge difference.