It’s zipping a zip file. E

no it isn’t, zipping is lossless. encoding is lossy.

No, the specific file size is irrelevant, he’s wanting smaller file sizes. CRF is a waste of data on more than 70% of scenes in hollywood movies. You set a bitrate and let it go. This is also why virtually all music now is VBR

unidentified attempts are just standard internet, bots are always poking every port on every IP 24/7 for last 25 years never stopping.

yea good luck with the ghost, otherwise there is always wordpress lol. If you’re wanting reader/viewer interaction there are only a few other than maybe just running a forum and posting _.

flatpak does indeed deduplicate. The stuff is updated to whatever is required as a dependency to whatever programs are installed. And versions are shared between applications when versions match as well…

So I am guessing it is just like flatpak

just fyi x264 and x265 are programs, written by VideoLAN organization. h264 and h265 are the codecs

And no doing that is no guarantee in visibly worse quality. Depends entirely on the video in that scenario. Plenty of them will look almost the same (though h265 is a lot blurrier than 264, I’d say h264 to h264 you’re likely to barely notice)

don’t even need chicken stock. If you cook the onions on bottom of pot first to brown, add chicken in and brown if you want then add all the other stuff + water. Add salt/pepper let it cook a while. This is literally how chicken stock is made. Onions + celery + carrots are called the holy trinity.

sausage & peppers & onions

just chop them up or don’t… and throw them all in. Sometimes I add sweet potato and or lentils

damn, of all the people you’d think those guys would actually have used the .local or .config =[

I have 73 dot files in my home directory lmao

There are no lossless copies of any movie that have ever been released to the public

Delivery formats (h265, h264, h263 etc) are compressed and lossy.

You need to do 2 pass encoding. You should also not use CRF. You should pick a bitrate for the file size you want. Do a first pass which analyzes the video to see which sections require more data, and then run a second pass which will give high bitrate to more action scenes and lower bitrate to the credits and slower talking scenes.

Some action scenes require 5 times more data to look as good as a talking dinner scene, you couldn’t even notice the quality difference but the bitrate requirement is literally 5 times more.

You also need to use the slow preset and use x265 if you’re doing this to archive the stuff forever. Do it once and do it right.

Lossy to lossy generally doesn’t matter, that is why people transcode over the web on their media players and the video seems fine, they are doing lossy to lossy on the fly there. What is actually stupid is saving media that is 100gb that you ALWAYS have to transcode to play, so no matter what you’re ramping up your wattage use to play a file. This is also why 99.9999% of consumed media is compressed, you can’t play it otherwise. Internet would explode too.

Likewise can size a jpeg down from 4000kb to 1000kb and it’ll likely be almost identical and good enough for most cases. There are certainly zero handheld devices you’d be able to notice it on.** If you size the 4000kb to 40kb now there will be an actual noticeable difference. There are different levels to all of this. **

Similarly a 100mb wav file should be a 10mb mp3 and you can’t tell the difference. You couldn’t even tell the difference with a 3mb mp3 file.

it will result in visible and audible distortion

This is completely wrong, it “might” be visible is accurate. The actual answer is “that depends”

If a file is 5000kbps and you use 3000kbps you now have 25-50% savings like he just said. Nothing is overestimated, you can encode to w/e you want. This is how lossy encoding works, for everything.

you can re-encode something at literally any bitrate, this isn’t relatable at all to “zipping a zip file” this is “opening a zip file, opening the document inside, removing data you don’t need, resaving it and rezipping it”

so a bunch of versions of stuff to be compatible… like what flatpak does?

nginx is a reverse proxy and quite easy to use. You generally would have it in front of anything you host, no matter what it is. There are very few things I’d trust directly exposed.

Ghost is the most full featured self hosted blogging platform other than wordpress. If he doesn’t care if people read it or not there are plenty options to just privately post your crap (which is what I do so I can go back and reference) however you probably don’t want that since you want “option for non registered users”

As far as security goes running Hugo and generating static sites is about as secure as it gets, no backend no user interaction though

He can also sign up on any of the news/blog sites and post there like medium etc.

that .steam is a bunch of symlinks to the .local one… which makes it even worse. they have also .steampid and .steampath.

and even worse a bunch of games are starting to add them there too.

Yea I like how a lot have moved to using .config but mozilla just moved out of there and now has a .mozilla folder outside of it… wtf… It is insanely sad.

I have actually moved my entire “user home folder”… folders out of there just because it is so ugly and unorganized. I now use /home/user/userfolders/… all my stuff like documents / videos etc in here

deleted by creator

Yea plenty of people in the south are aware too, things aren’t “hidden” this isn’t north korea or turkmenistan… yet. As someone else said we’ve known this is what they want to do for a few years now.