snooggums

Yes. If you don’t have adequate containment then strawberries can absolutely be a weed.

A delicious weed, but still a weed.

If you are happy with the plants being where they are then they aren’t weeds. The main problem is companies that sell plant killing chemicals and services treat the word ‘weed’ as if it had a universal meaning.

Perfection!

You are thinking of the one they used to design the common keyboard layout, Qwertycoatl.

Psychopatl

He took his role in Rocky IV too seriously.

It is just a format for the joke, like a web comic or video of a skit.

When used as a defense against violence or other severely harmful actions, yes.

The threat needs to either be imminent or an ongoing perpetuation of violence or other severely harmful action. An example of an ongoing severely harmful action would include being restrained physically or geographically and being starved.

“That would be expensive! Just slap a crab necklace on some guy and call it a day.”

-the producers

Don’t do it man!

False logic errors created by the AI while asking it to solve real world logic errors?

Not even a new thing either. Barely any jobs are done because people want to do specific types of work, and those jobs tend to be severely underpaid (teaching, social services).

People didn’t flock to factories in the 60s and 70s because they wanted to work in a factory, they wanted the pay and benefits. Same for office work today.

Acting like the entire history of the philosophy of knowledge is just some attempt make “knowing” seem more nuanced is extremely arrogant.

That is not what I said. In fact, it is the opposite of what I said.

I said that treating the discussion of LLMs as a philosophical one is giving ‘knowing’ in the discussion of LLMs more nuance than it deserves.

*Yore

At first I thought that might be a Pepsi reference, but you are probably too young to know about that.

Trying to treat the discussion as a philisophical one is giving more nuance to ‘knowing’ than it deserves. An LLM can spit out a sentence that looks like it knows something, but it is just pattern matching frequency of word associations which is mimicry, not knowledge.

Sementics 💦

I asked ChatDVP for a response to your post and it said you weren’t funny.

It doesn’t ‘know’ anything. It is glorified text autocomplete.

The current AI is intelligent like how Hoverboards hover.

My guess is that women who have had their pain dismissed for their entire lives fall into the trap of internalizing the dismissal.