“That would be expensive! Just slap a crab necklace on some guy and call it a day.”
-the producers
Also known as snooggums on midwest.social and kbin.social.
“That would be expensive! Just slap a crab necklace on some guy and call it a day.”
-the producers
False logic errors created by the AI while asking it to solve real world logic errors?
Not even a new thing either. Barely any jobs are done because people want to do specific types of work, and those jobs tend to be severely underpaid (teaching, social services).
People didn’t flock to factories in the 60s and 70s because they wanted to work in a factory, they wanted the pay and benefits. Same for office work today.
Acting like the entire history of the philosophy of knowledge is just some attempt make “knowing” seem more nuanced is extremely arrogant.
That is not what I said. In fact, it is the opposite of what I said.
I said that treating the discussion of LLMs as a philosophical one is giving ‘knowing’ in the discussion of LLMs more nuance than it deserves.
At first I thought that might be a Pepsi reference, but you are probably too young to know about that.
Trying to treat the discussion as a philisophical one is giving more nuance to ‘knowing’ than it deserves. An LLM can spit out a sentence that looks like it knows something, but it is just pattern matching frequency of word associations which is mimicry, not knowledge.
Sementics 💦
I asked ChatDVP for a response to your post and it said you weren’t funny.
It doesn’t ‘know’ anything. It is glorified text autocomplete.
The current AI is intelligent like how Hoverboards hover.
My guess is that women who have had their pain dismissed for their entire lives fall into the trap of internalizing the dismissal.
What about the thing I said?
Law enforcement is known to use genetic ancestry, so either they are using other sites or just running the tests themselves instead of doing a formal request.
If we believe 23 and me, they have only recieved 11 data requests for 15 accounts and provided zero data to law enforcement.
https://www.23andme.com/transparency-report/
That is a report on formal law enforcement requests for direct account information. Law enforcement is known to use genetic ancestry, so either they are using other sites or just running the tests themselves instead of doing a formal request.
I couldn’t find a case for suing companies, just defense requests to dismiss using the data in court but I might not be using the right search terms.
I didn’t watch any of it, but clicked a few points in time to see if there was some kind of reveal and came across this gem at 1:52:52
Am I missing something or is this just for generic, low tech “I need a website” use cases?
We already have tons of prebuilt websites available to slot someone’s shitty home business into too. AI slop is just a worse version of the things we already had.
It was in between the two extremes. It was like four hours a day on average of active hunting/gathering for some members of a group, others spent like 4 hours a day cooking/making clothes/building shelter. They had extended periods where they were sheltered from the weather, celebrating holidays, etc.
Hell, most animals only spend a limited number of hours per day actively surviving and have a significant amount of time resting or sheltering from weather.
And life expectancy was skewed by infant deaths. Sure, injury and death weren’t uncommon in their 30s but that is when humans are at their peak physical condition and most people who survived childhood made it to their 50s even if they had some lifelong injuries.
That reduces entry points but you will never ever perfectly seal every nook and cranny. All it takes is one insect to get in to be able to replicate if tmthe stuff that draws insects in is present.
People regularly live in homes without.insect infestations despite leaving windows wide open without screens. They keep the house tidy so they aren’t feeding anything that gets in, they close the windows when it is dark out to avoid light drawing things in, and they make sure to get rid of waste. If there is nothing for scavaging bugs to eat there won’t be anything for the predators to eat and so on.
The moon landing by hand wouldn’t have been as funny without the over the top body builders first.
When used as a defense against violence or other severely harmful actions, yes.
The threat needs to either be imminent or an ongoing perpetuation of violence or other severely harmful action. An example of an ongoing severely harmful action would include being restrained physically or geographically and being starved.