• 0 Posts
  • 4 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 11th, 2023

help-circle

  • magz :3@lemmy.blahaj.zonetoScience Memes@mander.xyzYOLO
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    tbf this uses a lot of medical jargon that most people who aren’t doctors will never need. put simply, it’s a case of a man who put hydrofluoric acid in his ass (owie) while high from snorting cocaine

    edit: wrong acid, it’s actually way worse than i thought


  • actually you can show that the naturals, integers and rationals all have the the same size.
    for example, to show that there are as many naturals as integers (which you do by making a 1-to-1 mapping (more specifically a bijection, i.e. every natural maps to a unique integer and every integer maps to a unique natural) between them), you can say that every natural, n, maps to (n+1)/2 if it is odd and -n/2 if it is even. so 0 and 1 map to themselves, 2 maps to -1, 3 maps to 2, 4 maps to -2, and so on. this maps every natural number to an integer, and vice-versa. therefore, the cardinality (size) of the naturals and the integers are the same.

    you can do something similar for the rationals (if you want to try your hand at proving this yourself, it can be made a lot easier by noting that if you can find a function that maps every natural to a unique rational (an injection), and another function that maps every rational to a unique natural, you can use those construct a bijection between the naturals and rationals. this is called the schröder-bernstein theorem).

    it turns out that you cannot do this kind of mapping between the naturals (or any other set of that cardinality) and the reals. i won’t recite it here, but cantor’s diagonal argument is a quite elegant proof of this fact.

    now, this raises a question: is there anything between the naturals (and friends) and the reals? it turns out that we don’t actually know. this is called the continuum hypothesis