Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square151linkfedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down137
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square151linkfedilink
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down5·2 years agoOK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·edit-22 years agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·2 years agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down9·2 years agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareStopJoiningWars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 years agoI hope for you that you’re high.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoFun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoun cub, une cube ;)
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·2 years agoThe cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoThe angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoMy apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
I hope for you that you’re high.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Ceci n’est pas une cube.
un* cube
un cub, une cube ;)
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.