• The Menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fedora or Ubuntu. But I’d say the important part is that they probably provide all necessary drivers.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Usually enabling Ubuntu’s third party / proprietary repo covers all necessary drivers.

        I remember having lots of driver issues on fedora but that was like two decades ago. I’d imagine they have that sorted now.

        Anyway this is good news. Grow the user base.

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I like the debian way with a separate repo for the non-free things needed for the hardware to function, so it’s not all or nothing. I want my wifi to work, but beyond things like that I only want free software.

          • jaybone@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Debian was interesting with their back port / forward port repos for drivers on newer hardware. I had to grab a wifi driver and put it on a USB stick, then figure out the dir to put it in so I didn’t have to manually modprobe or whatever to manually load the driver.

            20 years ago on fedora I had to manually mod probe like three different drivers to get my PCMCIA Broadcom wifi card to work. I’m sure fedora is better by now, but damn I still have bad memories about that.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        These seem to be the two most commonly supported distros by laptop manufacturers. Framework officially support these two distros, too (they have unofficial guides for a bunch of other distros though)