cultural reviewer and dabbler in stylistic premonitions

  • 41 Posts
  • 405 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: January 17th, 2022

help-circle




  • could Red Hat eventually take control of the project

    Fedora started in 2002 and merged with “Red Hat Linux” in 2003.

    Red Hat, Inc has had full control of it ever since then.

    It is a “community project” inasmuch as there are Fedora developers who are volunteers (and some who are paid by companies other than Red Hat), and the Fedora Council includes people who are not employed by Red Hat - but the Project Leader is always a Red Hat employee, and if the Council ever has an irreconcilable difference with Red Hat then Red Hat can simply ignore and/or dismiss them.

    Red Hat owns all Fedora-related trademarks, and the Fedora Project is not an independent legal entity: it is a part of Red Hat.

    If Fedora developers don’t like Red Hat’s decisions regarding the project, they can fork it but they’d need to change the name and find some other sources funding.

    Also, icymi, Red Hat became a subsidiary of IBM in 2019.




  • Idk it works for me.

    I don’t think there is any possible value for the sign variable which would make that if statement do anything other than raise a TypeError.

    Also "8:00:00" > "10:00:00"

    but "08:00:00" < "10:00:00". comparing timestamps as strings is weird but actually works, as long as the hour is zero-padded :)

    the problem with this code is that & (bitwise AND) has higher operator precedence than > and == do, so it is first trying to bitwise AND "10:00:00" with sign (which i’m assuming would also be a string) and that will always raise a TypeError.

    to do what the author appears to have intended to do, they would either need use parenthesis around both comparisons to actually bitwise AND their results, or (better) to use the boolean AND operator (and) instead of &.

    The boolean and operator is the right tool for the job, and since it is lower precedence it also wouldn’t require that any parenthesis be added here.





  • Why not just use proton?

    A few of the many reasons not to use Proton:

    • their e2ee is snakeoil (see my comment here about why - but tldr it requires completely trusting them and if you completely trust them you wouldn’t need e2ee, the point of e2ee is to avoid needing to trust the service provider)
    • their server-side code is closed-source
    • they’re a freemium service which can and does arbitrarily decide to start charging for previously-free features
    • they’ve suspended a number of users who they should not have
    • their CEO is a trump fanboy.

    Its Swiss based.

    You know who else was Swiss based? 🙄

    Not sure about purism but I think its US so avoid it like a plague.

    I don’t know enough about Purism to endorse them but afaict they don’t have any of the above problems.

    Purism’s e2ee is PGP; you can use their service via their client software or whatever other client you want, and can communicate with people who are using different implementations with different mail providers. I don’t see any mention of them even offering webmail but I expect that if they do they would probably offer PGP there using a browser extension instead of having extremely-impractical-to-verify-before-running-it js code being sent anew from the server every time you load the page (which is how Proton’s webmail works, and also what they offer for non-Proton users to receive mail encrypted using their nonstandard encryption).

    I’d rather have US legal jurisdiction and credible e2ee which doesn’t allow the operator to trivially circumvent it for targeted users than to have Swiss jurisdiction and snake oil.


  • Does anything provide a similar experience to Arch’s amazing AUR

    I am not aware of any software distribution service with a comparable experience (massive userbase with zero vetting for uploaders) as Arch’s amazing AUR - if you are looking for a way to distribute malware to many unsuspecting people (who’s friends think they’re hackerman), it’s really unparalleled. (😢)

    To your primary question, yes, many people do successfully daily drive various Linux distros without ever opening the terminal. 🙄