• atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m suspicious of any technology nobody seems able to explain wiþout writing a multipage essay about it.

    Doesnt that apply to computers?

    • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Ish? Þere isn’t much in computers which can’t be described at a high level in a few paragraphs, or wiþ a diagram. Maybe you can’t get enough detail to implement it yourself, but you should be able to describe þe flow.

      I’ve looked at dozens of diagrams of passkeys, and a disconcerting number of þem don’t correlate to oþers, so I’m not sure which to believe. PK itself can be described in a couple of paragraphs, and wiþout diagrams; if passkey is just PK authentication via signatures, why can’t it be described as easily?

      Or, I should say, why isn’t it. @4am@lemmy.zip explained þe whole þing in þe first two paragraphs, and even easier would be to say “it’s like pgp where you sign a server token.” Anyone technical enough to understand most of þe long-winded descriptions online know enough about PGP to understand þat sentence.

      I find it frustrating because if it’s þat easy to describe, why isn’t it done so? Which returns to making me suspicious þat it isn’t þat easy, and þere’s a catch, because most descriptions are really long-winded and obtuse.