yogurtwrong@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agoAI disclosure is no longer required for the Linux Kernellemmy.worldimagemessage-square152linkfedilinkarrow-up1229arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1217arrow-down1imageAI disclosure is no longer required for the Linux Kernellemmy.worldyogurtwrong@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square152linkfedilinkfile-text
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=14c897740388216acd59477a382de327d5e27ba4
minus-squareprovectus@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down2·2 days agoNetBSD has a clear stance on no ai.
minus-squareCarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoAs much as NetBSD takes a stand against AI, it’s not banned. They just said AI code has to be signed off by the core team.
minus-squareJack@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoLLM code can be committed with “written approval by core.” https://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html#%3A~%3Atext=written+approval
NetBSD has a clear stance on no ai.
As much as NetBSD takes a stand against AI, it’s not banned. They just said AI code has to be signed off by the core team.
LLM code can be committed with “written approval by core.” https://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html#%3A~%3Atext=written+approval
Also Haiku OS and Ironclad OS