• geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Too true. Our Media publishes all of Israels lies on the front page with a tiny quote that attributes it to the IDF.

      They repeat those lies over multiple articles. And they keep quoting those lies. Over and over.

      But one interview with Putin is a line too far…

      • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Main difference is that one is an evil war criminal while the other is a “good” war criminal

  • GarfGirl [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tucker Carlson: pushes far right conspiracy theories about the “scary transsexuals” transing kids and great replacement theory stuff, driving up hate crimes for years

    Nothing happens

    Tucker Carlson: interviews president of the bad country

    Suddenly people want him executed for treason or whatever

    Like I don’t give a shit what happens to tucker, but if the main problem you have with Tucker Carlson is that he’s a “traitor to America” or whatever, you’re a shit fucking ally. Like I unironically think most cishet liberals would be fine with Tucker Carlson if he said all the same stuff he normally does except he ended every segment with “and remember to vote for Joe Biden” and stopped criticising Ukraine.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why does the page have a “fairness” feedback meter, and how is enlightened centrism “factual and fair”?

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tucker Carlson is a fascist prick but this is ridiculous. He interviewed a guy and made it public. He did basic journalism. It might not be good journalism and it might be biased against the official party line but it is not like he has shot up an Ukrainian orphanage or something.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      In authoritarian bad country, professional bowtie journalists spread racist hatred to cause dissent among the impoverished for the sake of the elite ruling class, but they are forbidden from speaking to foreign enemies

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tucker spouting white supremacist homophobic transphobic speech

    EU sleeps

    Tucker flies to the EU or Russia to talk to another right winger about the weather or some shit

    EU freak out

    Really lets you know what their priorities are.

  • ComRed2 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Cucker was in danger of sliding into irrelevance after the fox news firing. His twitter show was a failure too. He knew he needed to do something big to stay relevant and this is that thing. He’ll be able to ride it for a while but after it fizzles out, he’ll need to come up with the next attention-grabbing scheme. It’s all about keeping the grift going. He doesn’t give a shit about any of this, It’s all about the money and the fame.

  • Dr_Gabriel_Aby [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think it’s so funny people are having long debates in this comment section and it’s essentially just saying a wealthy guy may or may not be able to fly to the EU because he did something.

    Literally nothing has happened and I gotta read 87 paragraphs about whether I should be a free speech absolutist or not,

  • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    like i don’t give a shit about tuck but in what reality is simply talking to the “enemy” some kind of punishable offense. y’all supposed to be all about free press, are they not free to speak to bad people?

    • M68040 [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Actually I kind of think the whole “get all precious about free speech” thing is kind of played out and mostly right wing bullshit anyhow

    • morry040@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      When Russia has repeatedly denied requests from other journalists in the past, I don’t think that you can really associate Carlson with being “free press”. This is a business deal, not journalism. How should we treat people who engage in business deals with sanctioned individuals?

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tucker-carlson-vladimir-putin-interview-b2492192.html

      “Does Tucker really think we journalists haven’t been trying to interview President Putin every day since his full-scale invasion of Ukraine? It’s absurd – we’ll continue to ask for an interview, just as we have for years now,” said CNN’s Christiane Amanpour.

      The BBC’s Russia editor, Steve Rosenberg, wrote on X: “Interesting to hear @TuckerCarlson claim that ‘no western journalist has bothered to interview’ Putin since the invasion of Ukraine. We’ve lodged several requests with the Kremlin in the last 18 months. Always a ‘no’ for us.”

      Yevgenia Albats, a Russian journalist and author of a book about the KGB, described Mr Carlson’s claim as “unbelievable”.

      “I am like hundreds of Russian journalists who have had to go into exile to keep reporting about the Kremlin’s war against Ukraine. The alternative was to go to jail. And now this SoB is teaching us about good journalism, shooting from the $1,000 Ritz suite in Moscow,” she wrote on X.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Your three sources are all undeniable propaganda. If you don’t think Tucker Carlson is a serious journalist, that’s perfectly understandable, but surely even the bottom of the barrel is more serious than the literal agents of the governments you’re at war with? If I was Putin, I’d also turn down the literal BBC. Libs are so up their own ego they can’t imagine someone not wanting to be filtered through their state’s propaganda apparatus.

      • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        “Press” has always been a business. This isn’t the dunk you think it is. They have always dealt with and interviewed sanctioned individuals. Some even interview prisoners! Imagine, interviewing not just somebody accused of breaking the law, but somebody convicted of it, like Mandela! What should we do with those journalists? According to some people on this thread:

  • M68040 [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Okay I don’t really like this bootleg Cold War thing we’ve got going on but any outcome where Tucker Carlson gets harmed is one I can accept

  • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    My favorite thing about the interview is when he literally told Putin to “shut the fuck up and get back to the script” when he started talking about the Nazis being bad. Like shit man, if you didn’t have the soft power you had I don’t think you’d be leaving Russia after that one.

    It was wild in general seeing Putin as not being the most wicked man in the room, which isn’t hard when the other person is probably one of the most notorious neo-nazi propagandists in America who literally quit their golden job because they asked him to hide the racism a bit better.