the rest of us threw them in the trash, and it was the same result.
the rest of us threw them in the trash, and it was the same result.
I mean it’s true here.
it’s more interesting to me you think Britney Spears wasn’t marketed towards men.
Is that really the case? I’m a layman so I may fuck this up - but do we truly understand why the locus of an allelomorph can change and how and why which phenotypic traits are affected or unaffected by addition and deletion?
I get the impression there is not model for why sometimes thousands of base pairs can fuck off with no impact, and sometimes it changes the organism unrecognizably.
I mean do we understand evolution better than gravity?
The last panel indicates someone at the bleeding edge of science, at that level too, surely there’s mystery in biology as well?
honestly, I preferred reddit. But I’m here out of principle.
yeah but Swiftie was physically repulsed to nausea by his wife. He’s the absolute poster boy for being in the closet.
could you share it to us laymen internet strangers?
I mean I’m kidding around, but really, most of the time we’re making a product to sell, and then selling the product to make more of it (or a new/better version of it) so that we can sell it more… so we can make it more… to sell more…
Its just all part of the same cycle. The OP meme could equally be:
Sales/Marketing: I made this sale
[…]
Product: I made this sale.
its bullshit all the way down.
ah yes, the famously bullshit-free career of software engineering
I mean you CAN just get an evening marketing job, 8-5 engineering, half hour break, 5.30-1:30am writing marketing copy, designing campaigns, A/B testing, budget management, demand gen, lead gen, sales enablement, CRO/CPC/CAC management, Martech tool alignment, attribution tracking, SEO research, content marketing, press releases and 3P distribution tools, all of which matched against brand voice and targeting to ABM the specific ICP within each vertical.
There’s literally nothing stopping you.
Agree to disagree - to me the Uk office was a Gervais vehicle with the Tim/Dawn romance Christmas special episode as a nice bonus and Gareth as an occasional funny victim of his own hubris. Keith and Finchy having a couple of good scenes. Neil, Donna, Rachel, Jennifer, Jamie, Ralph… all very forgettable.
In the US office, as mentioned, I think its a well rounded ensemble comedy where you can feel it’s a collab of a writers room and a complicit cast. Everyone has their favorite moments from pretty much any character…
In the early 2000s I probably would’ve liked the UK office more because I was an edgy teen. 25 years later and after an 8 year run, 200 episodes vs 14 - I feel like I’d much rather turn on the US one if I wanted a laugh.
heres a controversial opinion: The American Office vs the UK Office.
While I respect the original, Gervais’ external antics and the much meaner, darker humor just don’t create as good a comedy vehicle that enables the viewer to laugh and have fun and enjoy themselves watching the show
the former is known as “audience left/right”
but allow me to use a more dated theatrical terminology:
prompt side and bastard prompt.
If I were designing a natural language, I’d put adjectives after the nouns, so you start with the important things first
So - French?
no fast travel run
I’ve had similar thoughts, but also then I was worried about legal liability if there’s drugs, violence, arson (not saying homeless are bad - these things happen even amongst middle aged middle class people)
I prefer to become a big benefactor of a charity that does good work and attend the board meetings.
Hannah Montana Linux is the only correct answer if you want to get instantly pregnant.
if my “friend” challenged me to explain ALL of genetics in one picture - I would go way further than that.
I am commenting this from a terrible strip club with friends who dragged me here. I wish I was in your position.