deleted by creator

They are in such small concentrations that your body tends to eliminate them. They do not accumulate.

Not if you remove eyes, sprouts and green parts. What you want to avoid is green flesh. If you scratch under the skin and its green pitch it.

Ok if it is both then it isn’t your writing that is the issue as is the case with myself (with clear eyes my writing is often less clear than I thought).

We are seeing the generation of Americans who learned whole word instead of phonics and that causes sincere problems.

If everyone was gay the human race would cease to exist. I like my nephew. I imagine most like their kids. If we were all gay there would be no kids.

Because they did not feel the same and telling them would have just made things awkward. Sadly/fortunately not everyone is gay

Is the common thread your writing or are you noticing this on other’s posts?

Hexbear was never federated with world and Im not sure lemmygrad was either, and as I recall they defederated from explodingheads.

That’s vastly less common than uneducated Marxists. The right-libertarians just tend to be idealistic and/or super racist.

You are finding a lot of Marxists who are educated in Marxism but not necessarily modern communist/socialist thought as sadly many of the Marxists I see are the anti-scientific types that search for proof of their conclusions.

No, economics as a subject writ large in all nations has moved past Marx. Marx was a human and as such he was wrong about some things. Why would we cling to dated material that we know is not correct because a bunch of fanboys, who aren’t academics, think we should?

Do you think physics should hyper ficus on Newton or might you concede we have learned things since then?

Alternatively you could just read the whole sentence I wrote.

As long as you’re alive you can change that.

I think you need to clarify what you mean by libertarian capitalists as their delusionary states are a sliding scale. The AnCap is even less realistic than any Marxist and much more likely to be motivated by shitty behavior (Marxists might not be correct about everything but their hearts are in a good place), whereas the neoliberal is likely confused about how the impacts of free trade can harm the local working classes and might not be as beneficial as classic economics suggests.

Krugman, Mankiew et al are often writing opinion pieces and those should be seen as such.

I don’t think economics should be discussed in any format other than print as it is too hard to check the work on a video.

That simply is not true. Marx’s sociology and anthropological work has some value but the vast majority of Marx’s views on economics are no longer seen as useful, accurate or relevant. Bringing up Marx as a source us like bringing up Adam Smith, sure they wrote highly influential works but what was correct has been incorporated into the classical literature and what is incorrect, such as the labor theory of value, is taught as an example of previously held incorrect beliefs.

Very little of what Marx did is relevant to today’s economics because the focus is so incredibly different.

Considering your claim has already been disproven mathematically I don’t think you should be sitting in judgement of anyone’s intelligence. For fucks sake you think Medium is a good source?

Spiva’s comment is referencing the fact that traditionally the party did choose the candidate. This was the case until the 1950-60s depending on the party. There’s no law requiring an open primary and parties can do as they wish. If you had any understanding of US political history this wouldn’t have been a surprising quote but here you are.

I read a great article from a transman talking about having to confront how much lonelier it is to be a man especially after 30 if you aren’t married. It was interesting to see them talk about how much more distant people were post transition.

Those countries “rose again” because of massive investments in them. If the USA let Germany or Japan settle their debts and rebuild on their own they would be third world nations still. The same is true for Korea.

The greatness is money from foreign sources not some racist bullshit notion of inherent greatness.

By your “logic” the actual “greatness” is entirely American. That is of course a moronic notion as America had the money because European and Asian economies were devastated by WWI & WWII.

Your unpopular opinion is unpopular because it is just racist.

The media does not determine that science does. The scientists reject your notion completely and I suspect it is because you have zero idea how classification works.

Are you bad at math? Im asking because the only source that comes close to “proving” this is filled with bad math.