ozoned
Father of two, husband, gamer, lover of free software, and willing teacher.
Microblog: https://social.ozoned.net/@ozoned Livestream: https://stream.ozoned.net/ Videos: https://video.thepolarbear.co.uk/@ozoned Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#the-ozoned:matrix.org KoFi: https://ko-fi.com/ozoned
- 10 Posts
- 20 Comments
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Privacy@lemmy.ml•DeepSeek collects keystroke data and more, storing it in Chinese servers55·5 months agoChinese company does what American companies have done for 25+ years now!
Is it time for REAL data privacy laws or are we just gonna keep playing whack-a-mole with Chinese tech companies that get us nowhere?
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Privacy@lemmy.ml•I am researching the claim that Chromium is more secure than Firefox7·9 months agoI’d enjoy and update log personally.
None. Don’t connect it to the internet. Get a PC and use the TV as a glorified monitor.
Also, WHY should I trust Mozilla with this? I use Firefox because it’s the best alternative at the moment. However, Mozilla is degrading that trust by pushing their weather thing, pocket, turning on their ad network, etc.
Like a real reason I should trust Mozilla with this. Any company is 1 executive away from becoming Google levels of anti-privacy. So why would I EVER trust this?
First off, yes, the title of the post is misleading. Mozilla is creating a privacy focused ad system. However, I legit don’t get who this is for.
As a user, I’m not turning off my adblockers. Yes, privacy is important. I’m ok with some ads, but I’m not going to risk my privacy and security, because it’s not like I’ll have a clue who is backing said ads. So it’s not for me.
Normal users have shown that they really don’t care, let alone have any kind of clue what’s going on. So it’s not for them.
Advertisers have huge incentive to show you targeted ads. They don’t want to show someone an ad on the other side of the planet for something they don’t have access to. Also why would they want to show you an ad for something completely unrelated. What’s the incentive for them to give up their targeted ads?
It’s not like Mozilla is poising themselves for any kind of government oversight. I’m in the US, and the US gov doesn’t seem to give a shit. And the EU, while they have GDPR and they’re fining companies left and right, it doesn’t seem like they’re really targeting these kinds of ads. Outside of those two I don’t know anything about other countries honestly.
So again, I have zero clue who this is for or why Mozilla thinks this will be successful. There’s no incentive or knowledge that this is needed.
I use Firefox. I run Linux. I’m not trying to bash Mozilla here. I’m not trying to be a naysayer. I’m just trying to understand what kind of real world use case this solves and incentivizes users and advertises to use it over the alternatives.
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Which TV has a (mostly) ad-free OS and works with a few regular apps?2·10 months agoLOVE my Jellyfin.
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Which TV has a (mostly) ad-free OS and works with a few regular apps?1·10 months agoBuy a good inexpensive TV. The manufacturer can make them cheap because they’re losing money and hoping to gain it back with ads and analytics. Don’t connect it to the internet. Get a Steam deck or small form factor PC (Intel NUC or variant) install Linux, profit.
I’ve bought a few small form factor PCs, and again Steam Deck works great, for $300 and then a great TV. And I don’t have to put up with any ads, any crap applications that barely work, it’s just browsing ANY website I want, playing ANY PC game I want. It’s honestly the best outcome and I’ll never go back at this point.
Don’t let yourself accept the subpar TV applications that are just a website with awful frontends, that run like shit and that the companies creating these apps have 0 incentive to make properly because their app isn’t there for a good experience. It’s there to track you, just like the TV.
I’ve been on Proton for years and I’ve had a Visionary account for years. Proton’s price doesn’t really go up, but the quality and features does immensely. They give me extra storage every year. I get more VPNs, more password managers, more and more and more. IMO they have a track that shows they care about privacy and want to make things better.
I mainly use Matrix for myself, my family, and have rooms set up for a community.
Discord I have and use as a couple groups of friends are still and basically every game dev uses Discord now and you have to go to Discord to find out any info about the game, look up tips/hints, or even report bugs. FUN!
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Feds Ordered Google To Unmask Certain YouTube Users. Critics Say It’s ‘Terrifying.’121·1 year agoWell aware. And I trust Proton more than my local ISP.
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Privacy@lemmy.ml•Feds Ordered Google To Unmask Certain YouTube Users. Critics Say It’s ‘Terrifying.’English193·1 year agoBecause the average person doesn’t have a clue and they never think about this kind of thing. I’ve been called a conspiracy theorist by my own father as well as othesr for mentioning Snowden revalatins and using a VPN and all the privacy steps I take on the web.
Remember when cavemen unga bunga’d about dinosaurs? Whatever happened to those dinosaurs! It’s like the Flintstones wasn’t actually the ground breaking documentary it was or something!
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•People born on Leap Day, do you celebrate your birthday on February 28th, February 29th, or March 1st?20·1 year agoWife and I just had this conversation about drinking in the US. Legal drinking age is 21. So if you’re born Feb 29th, can you drink on the 28th? No. If your birthday is January 2nd, you can’t drink on January 1st. Only makes sense to me that it’d be March 1st, but I’m born in Dec, so not really my choice or opinion that matters. :-D Just saying.
ozoned@lemmy.worldOPto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Similar fables to King Arthur and Robin Hood in other cultures?3·1 year agoHe once breast fed a flamingo back to health! TO BILL BRASKY!
ozoned@lemmy.worldOPto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Similar fables to King Arthur and Robin Hood in other cultures?3·1 year agoWow! Thanks for sharing amd all the detail. Amazing stuff. Loved reading it.
Their design was more mobile type wherr you don’t minimize windows, you just switch between them or between spaces. I’ve used Gnome forever, including the rough times on Gnome 3.0, and I’ve always used a system tray as well. Never liked leaving clutter everywhere and imo it goes against the minimal design. But thankfully easily extendible.
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•[Resolved] Debian 12: trying to auto-mount a NTFS-formatted hard drive by making an entry in fstab. Getting the error "mount: /etc/fstab: parse error at line 18 -- ignored"2·2 years agoBut you have a space in there. I don’t know how spaces are handled in fstab. You’ll either need to quote it or at least escape the space:
UUID=D4C0A66EC0A65710 ‘/media/lucky/New Volume’ ntfs rw,auto,users,exec,nls=utf8,umask=003,gid=46,uid=1000 0 0
OR
UUID=D4C0A66EC0A65710 /media/lucky/New\ Volume ntfs rw,auto,users,exec,nls=utf8,umask=003,gid=46,uid=1000 0 0
The space is absolutely an issue in fstab as it’s thinking “Volume” is the filesystem type and ntfs goes into your options, etc.
ozoned@lemmy.worldto Linux@lemmy.ml•[Resolved] Debian 12: trying to auto-mount a NTFS-formatted hard drive by making an entry in fstab. Getting the error "mount: /etc/fstab: parse error at line 18 -- ignored"2·2 years agoYou’ve made a directory path literally called
/media/lucky/New Volume
?
That REALLY doesn’t seem like a good idea considering that *'s are wildcards for anything, and Linux isn’t really fond of spaces.
The error basically tells you that you have an error on line 18, which I’m assuming is this line you’re stating and that it’s ignored that line so that it can still go on and mount other things.
Most likely you’d want something like:
mkdir /media/lucky/NewVol
and then your fstab would be:
UUID=D4C0A66EC0A65710 /media/lucky/NewVol ntfs rw,auto,users,exec,nls=utf8,umask=003,gid=46,uid=1000 0 0
Also do you have a lib or something for linux to handle NTFS file system types? I haven’t run Windows in 17 years now, so I don’t have a clue if Linux can natively handle NTFS.
You can also run:
# lsblk
or
# blkid
to get the storage information and verify the storage UUID is correct.
Excellent Point. If that’s the case though, then wouldn’t other countries follow suit which still limits big tech’s reach and makes them less profitable and less powerful? Idk. Guess we’ll see how it plays out. Either way, I’m staying as far from those ecosystems as possible to at least try to mitigate some of what they do. I’ll never be totally successful, genie is put of the bottle, but we can at least attempt.