Ghostery has an “auto-reject cookies” setting.
Ghostery has an “auto-reject cookies” setting.
Thanks for taking the time to explain that so clearly! It’s really interesting.
If something was written by V3 and then published, that text doesn’t get updated every time a new version of chatGPT comes out.
The text isn’t dynamic.
It could be a new level added to the peer review of work. Nothing to do with the university. Just “other professionals”.
A thesis isn’t just an exam, it’s a real scientific paper.
And usually claims is contents as fact, which can be referenced by others as fact.
And absolutely should be open to scrutiny so long as it is relevant.
Yeah but if your wrote your thesis in 2024, and the detector is run on it in 2026…
You’re probably busted.
It’s not like you’ll re-write your thesis with every major ChatGPT release.
I bet AI detection is going to get a lot better over time.
I wonder if there’s going to be retrospective testing of theses as time goes on.
Could really damage some careers down the line.
Edit: guys, retrospective testing means it was done later (i.e. with a more up to date AI detector).
Don’t get really drunk or stoned and end up being obnoxious.
Try to be aware of traffic (especially bikes) and of blocking sidewalks/alleys etc. Look both ways on every lane of traffic you cross (including both bike lanes).
Try to branch out your trip from the exact center of the city (or by the train station) and don’t rent an Airbnb inside the city center (they drive up local rents).
If you’re standing on red bricks or red tarmac, you’re probably blocking the bike lane.
If you can’t see the bike lane, it’s likely that you’re standing in it (they aren’t always marked).
Everybody wants to be a Bob
Some diff tools don’t handle indentation by default.
So if you add a wrapper, it counts everything inside it as “changed”
sets the diff to ignore whitespace
Lines changed: 3
You’re not wrong.
Check out the Behind the Bastards episodes on him to see how his charitable efforts often end up more destructive than not.
Ah yes, the American dream.
You get the first hundred a month for free.
Maybe you could ration it for when you need high-quality searches?
Yeah.
Do you mean “programmers” by developers?
Or do you mean “the people who are involved in the development of the app”?
Because the money & marketing people are the ones who want trackers.
But they are usually such a high prio for the app that it’s put them in or get fired.
E-commerce isn’t as much of a monopoly as “reddit-style social media”.
Technically anyone has the ability to open an eshop and sell whatever they want (provided they follow the appropriate sales/tax laws etc).
It’s just that people don’t like to buy from no-name shops online, as reputations give a level of accountability.
I imagine a lot of people got their credit card details stolen when the first eshops appeared.
The terms listed probably aren’t used as defined in whatever material they’re being used in (which is pretty normal).
In the context of most modern usage, I’d say the difference is conditional on the consent of the subject (non-manufactured consent).
Exploitation also (I believe) implies a finite resource. Or at least, it’s going to run out if it’s being monetised VS exploited. For example, overfishing the oceans.
Did you see the little photo icon at the bottom of the post preview?
That will expand the image (so you don’t have to open the post).
Tipped jobs have a lower minimum wage than untipped jobs.
If you give the option for customers to tip…
Then it’s easier to underpay them (further)
This does have the vibe of those pro-billionaire articles the Washington Post puts out…