Plex

There’s your problem. Here’s the solution: Kodi.

I compiled my m3u playlist by searching through various lists, especially iptv-org linked on another comment.

As far as sports, I’ve found a variety of random sports channels but nothing targeted to my area/teams.

I think it could be difficult to find reliable and relevant sports channels that are more legal/stable. Like someone else said, you might want an antenna for local sports if you don’t already have.

This is me still accidentally downloading cam versions of movies.

Yes, there are many problematic states, probably all of them. That’s why people thought it was sus when you singled out india.

My advice: Download a geo-IP database and firewall yourself in.

Is this winston churchhill?

Isn‘t autism and many other psychological conditions under and over diagnosed at the same time?

Yeah, that’s what happens when there’s no objective, scientific criteria and the “diagnoses” are based on the subjective observation of behavior.

“Science” under capitalism is not just political. It’s literally fascist.

Rent.

lol. why would people downvote this solid sarcasm? too comfortable in their own privilege…

Gotta love the irony of these people releasing a movie about resisting an insane empire…

Then bringing an insane empire down on anybody who tries to share the movie.

Economics: Figure out what rich people want to hear and get funded forever.

Psychiatry in the front of the room covered in blood and sitting on a pile of cash.

I might go even further and say there’s no “math”. There are a wide variety of axiomatic systems (eg. games). None has the sole claim to being “math”. Maybe they’re all “math”.

(On the other hand… I guess any system that contains the “natural numbers” would be sufficient for the bulk of what’s widely considered “math”.)

I think saying that a theorem is true presumes the axioms from which it was proven and so the entire system is “true everywhere forever”.

I often find it helpful to think of chess as my axiomatic system. When we say the king is in checkmate, it presumes that we accept all the underlying rules of chess. And these pieces that theoretically form a checkmate will always do so forever… Assuming the usual rules of chess, assuming they’re unchanging, etc.

When you put things in terms of chess, these “deep” statements about “math” often become banal. And it works for any game that’s a “formal system” (eg. most board games).

or far away enough…

https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/02/09/are-economists-overrated/overreliance-on-the-pseudo-science-of-economics

I recently asked for advice about making a PiPhone, if you’re interested in going that route.

(I’m still trying to figure out the best approach, but my research is slow due to a million projects and no time.)

Welcome to the boyz club. barf.

Why are they both women? I wonder if there’s some underlying subtext here… jfc.

NOFAPSA