Sorry if my question was weird.

And no, I am not some human’s pet that just became intelligent and took over their Lemmy account. 😺

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would say yes.

    But… that would include them contributing to society. Not just the household.

    • some_guy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So people who don’t “contribute to society” dont deserve rights?

      Also who decides what is a worthy contribution to society?

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the point is that for them to have rights requires that they be autonomous in society.

        You don’t complain that “kids don’t have rights!” Because of course they don’t. They’re children. Incapable of voting/driving/owning property.

        If they are intelligent but still physically incapable of these things then they would just be considered to have the same rights as children do. They’re citizens but not independent.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a good argument, if they were smarter than humans but didn’t integrate into human society so we give them the right to vote? I’d say not.