Why are so many mobile browsers at least 100, if not 200 megabytes in size? Even Firefox Focus which is supposed to be small and, you know, focussed is 85MB big.

The smallest browser I could find was the /e/ Foundation’s built-in browser for /e/OS. It’s 12MB.

It’s kind of between Firefox and Focus in terms of features so why are all other browsers so big? Is there a small version of Firefox for Android?

Edit: I just looked up the /e/ Browser repo on their GitLab and the browser appears to be bigger than the 12MB displayed in App Info. It’s about 70MB, so pretty comparable to the other browsers. I was so confused by the size difference but that’s cleared up now.

  • illectrility@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, of course a lot is cached and stored in user data but I don’t get why the app itself has to be so big. It’s not significantly faster.

    Edit: Never mind all that, I edited the post, the app size wasn’t correctly shown.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Caching is separate. Honestly, I don’t know how to explain it to you without giving you a college level explanation of time complexity.

      Think about the most basic way to sort a list of arbitrary size; comparing the first item to the second item, swapping if the second item is smaller, and then repeating until no more swaps occur. This has a time complexity of O(n^2), so on a list of n size, it would be extremely cheap on memory (O(1)) but will take a very long time if n is large.

      There’s another sorting algorithm called quicksort that is much faster (how it works isn’t very important atm), with a time complexity of O(nlog n). This is far faster than the other method of sorting, but it comes at the cost of needing a lot more memory to execute the algorithm, O(log n) of space.

      If you scale this simple process to a multithreaded piece of software executing thousands of algorithms per second, like a browser, the size of n scales to the rest of the app. Browsers are generally written in C++, which requires memory to be preallocated. The size of the app includes this memory requirement, as well as the executable.

      • illectrility@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I understand, my confusion was caused by the misleading app size shown in App Info. It’s actually like 70MB so my question is dumb. I’m sorry for wasting your time

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          it’s not dumb, and you didn’t waste my time! I love teaching computer science to people. Honestly, this was kinda fun. I haven’t consciously thought about these concepts in about 6 years, so it was a good refresher for me too lol

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        One time I had a database migration running on a database of about 50gb. After eight hours it was still going.

        My client had the suggestion to try bumping up the memory on the server. So (in digital ocean) I scaled a server from 8gb memory to 64gb, and ran the same migration. It took about twenty seconds. Then just scaled the server back down.

        It’s kinda amazing just how significant efficiency differences can be between strategies. In most realms a 10% improvement is huge. In software a 1000000000% improvement can result from choosing a new strategy.