QmKt2dmmU49sdcm.jpg

I am just about to set up my new Linux machine, which will be used to convert analog video and audio to digital video and audio. Is there any reason why I shouldn’t run the system off of a live USB stick (say, a good quality one from Sandisk), that is, without installing Linux on the hard drive and not setting up a boot partition, a system partition, and all that?

  • lepton64@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    The thing is USB sticks are much more unstable than an nvme or something, so you’re more likely to lose your data. They can also be stolen way easier than an nvme or hard drive, but if you encrypt it w/ a strong password that shouldn’t be an issue.

  • LogicOverFeelings@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    That’s a totally valid use case, I have done it in the past and there are Linux distributions that are made to be used this way. Those distributions usually work by loading the whole system into ram which avoid multiples writes to the USB stick. They also usually offer some persistence mechanism so that data can be added on the USB stick.

    Examples of distribution meant to be used this way: MX Linux, Puppy Linux

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You can configure a lighter-weight setup (lxde, xfce, maybe mate, mint) so that it writes only if you do some writing. And also mount options to cache for a minute or so, for the smaller writes. But you better have some RAM then, for Firefox in memory/tmpfs. And compiling larger software will destroy your stick.

    Also keep in mind, that thumbdrives are relatively cheap is, because it’s flash memory is one step in quality before defetctive. Also no wear leveling.

  • MajesticTechie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Mainly performance will take a hit. USB drives are also not really rated for consistent writes so you’ll find a USB dies quicker than a standard drive

  • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No.

    The person who said it’ll be too slow and you’ll ruin your usb is right but also:

    Your system supports a nvme and sata. Dumping raw to nvme then working with it there so it doesn’t take so long to page into ram will be significantly faster.

    Use spinning drives for storage though.

    • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m still looking for a place to put the spinning drive though 😅 this micro-ATX chassi, while really practical in many other aspects, doesn’t leave much room for HDDs. 🫠 I could just leave one “standing” on the bottom of the chassi if I don’t have to secure it with screws 🤣

      • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        What case? I can’t tell myself because you blurred out the info…

        You may end up needing to use attached storage either in the form of a nas or some kind of usb bullshit.

        E: asusprime ap201?

  • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    To tune the question slightly: what about USB SSD? I thought of doing the same thing for a different PC. (For HTPC.)

  • nieceandtows@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I remember a long time ago when I went to an onsite assignment and got a laptop. I didn’t have my personal laptop so I just booted puppy Linux off a USB drive and used the office laptop as my personal device until I bought a personal laptop there. Fun times.