• cobysev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Meh, I’ll start with the '30s. I feel we need a little more buffer from the late 1900s.

    I still keep forgetting it’s a quarter of the way into the 21st century already. I keep thinking it’s still like 2002 or something. I think we need to get away from all the 2’s in the dates before I’ll start to recognize the new century as independent from the 20th century.

    • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Fair, the past two decades just don’t have the same “ring” as “the 20’s” or any of the next ones. I still remember people realizing that they never really knew what the “20’s/30’s/etc” naming for the first decade of the 1900’s after the 90’s ended. I feel like local news and other media made points to tell people “the noughties/oughts”. So much attention really put on the simple shortening of everything after “20’s” last century. Even “the teens” just doesn’t have the same “ring” to it, and since 10-12 aren’t “teens”.