L E F L I
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago

Moon dust

mander.xyz

message-square
34
link
fedilink
661

Moon dust

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
34
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    1 year ago

  • JoYo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure everyone is allergic to having their skin and lungs rubbed with mica.

    • verdare [he/him]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, moon dust is basically microscopic shrapnel. No one should be breathing that shit in.

  • xkforce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Moon dust is functionally a lot like asbestos. It is composed of a sizeable amount of tiny shards of rock that aren’t great for your lungs.

    • stephan@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, you should really consider that before breathing on the moon

      • xkforce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Any lunar dust that they made contact with would have found its way into the lunar module for them to breathe in and be exposed to.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t moon dust just sand?

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s sand that has never been exposed to water or oxygen. This leaves various reactive chemicals on the surface that would normally be broken down. The lack of water also means the particles haven’t been smoothed off as much. They are sharp and spiky.

      The combination of these effects makes the dust quite unique, compared to earth dust.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also reportedly smells like gunpowder.

        • prayer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Burned or unburned? They are two distinct smells.

          • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Burned, according to the astronauts. I don’t know if the exact mechanism has been published anywhere, but since spent gunpowder has been oxidized I imagine that’s what’s going on with the dust as well.

    • vind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron

      • 0110010001100010@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 year ago

        And 100% reason to remember the name.

      • nxdefiant@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        All those oxides but the iron is pure? SUS.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sand, but sharp due to a lack of water erosion, and formed mostly from asteroid impacts and thermal cycling. So it’s more like glass dust. It’s possible it has similar effects on lungs as asbestos, but we don’t know for sure.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah got it.

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Jack Schmidt = Anakin confirmed.

      • rustydomino@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like Jack Schmidt = Cave Johnson

  • halvar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not being allergic to finely graded rocks that have been bathing in radiation for billions of years seems more unlikely.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The sample size is at least a little bit bigger…

    Some guy stole moon rocks (presumably still had moon dust on them) to bang his gf on them.

    • salarua@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      better link: https://www.timesnownews.com/the-buzz/article/thad-roberts-the-nasa-intern-who-stole-lunar-rocks-to-have-sex-on-the-moon/748813

      don’t use amp links pls

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Roberts was sentenced to more than eight years in prison for his role in the Moonrock caper, as well as a separate offence of stealing dinosaur bones from a museum in Utah.

        I’m afraid to ask what he did with the dinosaur bones!

        • credo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Boned on bones, obviously.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thank you so much

  • gitamar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Here’s a source for this: https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Human_and_Robotic_Exploration/The_toxic_side_of_the_Moon

    He’s a climate change denier though.

    • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      wow seems you’re absolutely right https://www.livescience.com/63836-harrison-schmitt-climate-change.html

      very sad 😔

  • Raxiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, if someone were to crash the moon into the earth to stop it escaping, as many as 1/12 of the population could experience a reduced quality of life?

    Might need to consider not doing that I suppose.

  • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    geordi-no “moon dust”

    geordi-yes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Changesite-(Y)

  • Grubberfly 🔮@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    what’d be the smallest sample size that would yield a relevant result?

    30? 1000?

    • Gonzako@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me. Just get me there

      • Shellbeach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can we not… Just… Bring back some moon dust?

        • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s the possibility of contamination if we do that.

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, if humans were a homogeneous population maybe that could work. But just imagine the huge number of factors at play here. Like, demographics, cultural background (different exposures & different allergy rates in general I would guess), genetic susceptibilities, individual lifestyles (e.g smoking) and probably a lot more! Even a sample size of 1000 seems pretty small to test for general human allergy rates to moon dust. If you were talking about just one population of humans, e.g. the US, you would certainly need more than 30 but maybe not 1000.

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    For reference: https://www.newsweek.com/last-man-walk-moon-allergic-lunar-dust-1449945

    But. Moon dust is poisonous and gets everywhere.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 847 users / day
  • 3.28K users / week
  • 10.4K users / month
  • 23.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 14.6K subscribers
  • 4.58K Posts
  • 110K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org