me like use nano. nano say how do thing. nano exit easy.

  • psud@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Emacs has a menu, it’s not exactly hard. F10 to open the menu in text mode

  • AlbatrossFanboy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t get why there’s so much prejudice towards nano users in the Linux community, people act like nano is useless but it performs its job well, and it does it without being large or overly complicated.

  • Francislewwis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Honestly nano is perfect for quick edits. Vim and Emacs are powerful, but sometimes you just want to open a config file, change one line, and exit without fighting the editor. 😄

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Vim does not just work if you don’t know how to get into edit mode and save and quit from there. Nano even has built in search and replace.

        • creation7758@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Funny story, when i first got into linux (almost a decade ago), I accidentally opened nano pasting some random command off the internet and didn’t know how to close it because I didn’t know what the ^ symbol meant.

          I had successfully been quiting (and using) vim for a few months at this point.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    nano is usually built in. Adding another one is just redundant if all you’re using it for is editing an occasional config file.

    Honestly never understood the hate for it. Who cares? Petty, stupid, nerd-wars over little crap like a text editor is the reason average people don’t even consider linux.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nano is fine for editing, fine for working with configuration files. It only fails when you try to use it as a development editor

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I very rarely see people hate nano (except a few comments in this thread), and I always see nano recommended as the text editor when people give advice on doing things in the command line

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I see vim preinstalled more than nano (e.g. in container images). I’ve been trying to convert to micro, though. It has better support for terminal emulators than nano.

  • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Linux text editor discourse has been baffling to me for decades now. I don’t care which you use, and I care even less about why.

  • Rose@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    VS Code is probably the editor that’s easiest to exit. If I ran it on the computer I first ran Emacs on, it’d exit immediately, because VS Code requires a modern version of Windows and that computer had Windows 3.11. If I ran it on the first computer I ran Linux on, it’d also exit immediately because the machine would run out of memory. (…it was a 486DX, I don’t remember how much memory it had, but VS Code doesn’t run well if your memory is measured in megabytes)

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Emacs is a table saw, vim is a chainsaw, nano is a scissor. Every problem those 3 solve is a differently sized single sheet of paper.

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I first ran into nano when I gave Gentoo a try. I had to edit a few config files, so I ran vi… no vi. Emacs? No Emacs. Well, shit, what am I supposed to do? So I went back a bit and read more carefully, apparently there was a thing called nano.
    So I ran that. Ew. It was a clone of an old DOS editor of all things. What kind of lunatic had ported that? Anyway I managed to do my edits with it, added normal editors to the system and was on my way.
    It was also the last time I used it.